About fpdsf_author

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far fpdsf_author has created 197 blog entries.

United States v. Smith, No. 20-12667 (Jan. 12, 2022)

In United States v. Smith, No. 20-12667 (Jan. 12, 2022) (William Pryor, Grant, Hull), the Court vacated the defendant's conviction for theft of trade secrets and related sentencing enhancements for lack of venue, affirmed the extortion conviction and related sentencing enhancements, and remanded for resentencing. The Court addressed whether an accused can be tried in a [...]

2022-01-12T19:09:03-05:00January 12th, 2022|

United States v. Fleury, No. 20-11037 (Dec. 16, 2021)

In United States v. Fleury, No. 20-11037 (Dec. 16, 2021) (Wilson, Rosenbaum, Hull), the Court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for transmitting interstate threats and cyberstalking. First, the Court rejected the defendant’s facial and as-applied First Amendment challenges to the cyberstalking statute.  Joining every circuit to address the issue, the Court held that the statute was [...]

2021-12-16T22:10:39-05:00December 16th, 2021|

Telcy v. United States, No. 19-13029 (Dec. 10, 2021)

In Telcy v. United States, No. 19-13029 (Dec. 10, 2021) (Wilson, Lagoa, Brasher), the Court affirmed the dismissal of a 2255 motion as an unauthorized second or successive motion. The issue on appeal was whether a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act qualifies as a “new judgment” for purposes of the [...]

2021-12-13T15:37:43-05:00December 13th, 2021|

United States v. Litzky, No. 20-10709 (Nov. 23, 2021)

In United States v. Litzky, No. 20-10709 (Nov. 23, 2021) (Jordan, Newsom, Ed Carnes), the Court affirmed defendant's convictions for possessing child pornography, producing it, and conspiring to do the same. Defendant raised two issues on appeal: (1) the district court violated her constitutional right to present a defense by excluding expert testimony related to her intellectual disability; [...]

2021-12-06T18:45:54-05:00December 6th, 2021|

United States v. Grady, No. 20-14341 (Nov. 22, 2021)

In United States v. Grady, No. 20-14341 (Nov. 22, 2021) (Branch, Grant, Ed Carnes), the Court affirmed defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiracy, destruction of property on a naval installation, depredation of government property, and trespass. Defendants, members of the Plowshares Movement--equipped with spray paint, bolt cutters, hammers, blood, banners, crime scene tape, Go-Pro cameras, and [...]

2021-12-06T18:44:42-05:00December 6th, 2021|

United States v. Ramirez, No.  20-10564 (Nov. 1, 2021)

In United States v. Ramirez, No.  20-10564 (Nov. 1, 2021) (Wilson, Rosenbaum, Hull), the Court vacated the defendant's sentence and remanded. Defendant purchased firearms and firearm parts and components, often through straw purchasers, and sold them throughout Colombia.  Six firearms found themselves into the hands of members of the National Liberation Army ("ELN"), which the U.S. State [...]

2021-11-01T23:38:48-04:00November 1st, 2021|

United States v. Wheeler, No. 17-15003 (Oct. 21, 2021)

In United States v. Wheeler, No. 17-15003 (Oct. 21, 2021) (Wilson, Lagoa, Brasher) (per curiam), the Court reversed a judgment of acquittal for two defendants and affirmed the convictions and sentences for three defendants involved in a telemarketing scheme that tricked investors into making stock purchases. First, notwithstanding the district court’s judgment of acquittal, the [...]

2021-10-22T15:19:33-04:00October 22nd, 2021|

United States v. Perry, No. 16-11358 (Sept. 29, 2021)

In United States v. Perry, No. 16-11358 (Sept. 29, 2021) (Grant, Marcus, Axon (N.D. Ala.)), the Court affirmed the defendants' convictions and sentences. Defendants were indicted on numerous charges related to their involvement in a multi-year, multi-state drug distribution organization--namely, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute in excess of 5kg of cocaine and in excess of [...]

2021-09-29T19:33:45-04:00September 29th, 2021|

United States v. Tinker, No. 20-14474 (Sept. 28, 2021)

In United States v. Tinker, No. 20-14474 (Sept. 28, 2021) (Wilson, Newsom, Branch) (per curiam), the Court held that a district court does not procedurally err when it denies a request for compassionate release based on the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) sentencing factors (or U.S.S.G. 1B1.13's policy statement) without first explicitly determining whether the defendant could present [...]

2021-09-29T16:56:21-04:00September 29th, 2021|
Go to Top