About fpdsf_author

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far fpdsf_author has created 199 blog entries.

United States v. Starr, 159 F.4th 901 (11th Cir. 2025)

In United States v. Starr, 159 F.4th 901 (11th Cir. 2025) (Newsom, Jordan*, Honeywell (MDFL)), the Court affirmed the defendants’ interstate murder for hire convictions, in violation of 18 U.S.C. s. 1958, arising from the murder of Jason Starr’s ex-wife, Sara Starr. In affirming the murder for hire convictions, the Court also held: The [...]

2026-02-11T18:59:57+00:00febrero 4th, 2026|

United States v. Jones, No. 24-10938 (11th Cir. Dec. 19, 2025)

Update: “After considering the government’s petition for panel rehearing, we vacate our earlier opinion and issue this one in its place. Our holding is unchanged. The only modifications to our opinion are in Part II.B.1, clarifying that while we conclude that the prosecutor engaged in reversible misconduct by relying on an unadmitted exhibit during [...]

2026-02-11T19:00:33+00:00febrero 4th, 2026|

United States v. Keegan, No. 22-13019 (11th Cir. Dec. 17, 2025)

In United States v. Keegan, No. 22-13019 (11th Cir. Dec. 17, 2025) (Grant, Newsom, Abudu), the Court affirmed Keegan’s conviction for CP production, after a conditional guilty plea preserving Keegan’s right to appeal the district court’s pre-trial evidentiary ruling. The district court had excluded a defense expert psychologist’s proffered testimony about Keegan’s post-indictment statements, made [...]

2026-02-11T19:00:56+00:00febrero 4th, 2026|

United States v. Erica Kelley Day, No. 24-13312 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2025)

In United States v. Erica Kelley Day, No. 24-13312 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2025) (Pryor CJ, Lagoa, Kidd)—also a government appeal—the Court held that a district court, when considering a government motion to depart from a statutory minimum for substantial assistance on one count, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) & USSG 5K1.1,  may not [...]

2026-02-11T19:01:16+00:00febrero 4th, 2026|

United States v. Karen Altagracia Perez & Jovan Rivera Rodriguez, No. 23-12977 (11th Cir. Dec. 2, 2025)

In United States v. Karen Altagracia Perez & Jovan Rivera Rodriguez, No. 23-12977 (11th Cir. Dec. 2, 2025) (Pryor CJ, Branch, Abudu)—a government appeal—the Court held that a district court, when considering a government motion to depart from a statutory minimum for substantial assistance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) & USSG 5K1.1,  may not [...]

2026-02-11T18:56:01+00:00febrero 4th, 2026|

US v. Barry, No. 23-12101 (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026)

In US v. Barry, No. 23-12101 (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) (Kidd, CJ Pryor, Grant), the Court vacated and remanded Mr. Barry’s sentence, including the restitution amount, after he was convicted by a jury for his involvement in a credit card fraud conspiracy. In reversing Mr. Barry’s sentence, the Court held that: The district court [...]

2026-02-11T18:57:15+00:00febrero 4th, 2026|

LAW STUDENT INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE - Southern District of Florida LAW STUDENT INTERNSHIP OPPORTUNITY WE ARE CURRENTLY NOT ACCEPTING ANY FURTHER APPLICATIONS FOR SUMMER 2026.  PLEASE REVIEW BELOW FOR FALL AND SPRING APPLICATION DEADLINES The Federal Public Defender's Office for the Southern District of Florida represents indigent defendants in federal criminal cases and is managed by [...]

2026-03-02T16:15:30+00:00enero 1st, 2026|

United States v. Mims, No. 22-13215 (J. Pryor, Branch, Grant)

In United States v. Mims, No. 22-13215 (J. Pryor, Branch, Grant), the Court held that a district court, even after a defendant completes her probation term, maintains ancillary jurisdiction over a criminal case to enforce unsatisfied restitution obligations that had been included in the defendant’s sentence. Applying the plain error standard, the Court also held [...]

2025-07-31T20:11:45+00:00julio 31st, 2025|

United States v. Alhindi, No. 24-10595 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024)

In United States v. Alhindi, No. 24-10595 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024) (C.J. Pryor, Jordan & Marcus), the Court dismissed Mr. Alhindi’s second appeal* of his confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 4241 as moot, because the underlying criminal indictment had been dismissed during the pendency of the appeal, after the district court’s finding that Mr. [...]

2025-01-03T16:47:41+00:00enero 3rd, 2025|
Go to Top