United States v. Karen Altagracia Perez & Jovan Rivera Rodriguez, No. 23-12977 (11th Cir. Dec. 2, 2025)

In United States v. Karen Altagracia Perez & Jovan Rivera Rodriguez, No. 23-12977 (11th Cir. Dec. 2, 2025) (Pryor CJ, Branch, Abudu)—a government appeal—the Court held that a district court, when considering a government motion to depart from a statutory minimum for substantial assistance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) & USSG 5K1.1,  may not [...]

2026-02-11T18:56:01+00:00February 4th, 2026|

US v. Barry, No. 23-12101 (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026)

In US v. Barry, No. 23-12101 (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) (Kidd, CJ Pryor, Grant), the Court vacated and remanded Mr. Barry’s sentence, including the restitution amount, after he was convicted by a jury for his involvement in a credit card fraud conspiracy. In reversing Mr. Barry’s sentence, the Court held that: The district court [...]

2026-02-11T18:57:15+00:00February 4th, 2026|

United States v. Mims, No. 22-13215 (J. Pryor, Branch, Grant)

In United States v. Mims, No. 22-13215 (J. Pryor, Branch, Grant), the Court held that a district court, even after a defendant completes her probation term, maintains ancillary jurisdiction over a criminal case to enforce unsatisfied restitution obligations that had been included in the defendant’s sentence. Applying the plain error standard, the Court also held [...]

2025-07-31T20:11:45+00:00July 31st, 2025|

United States v. Alhindi, No. 24-10595 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024)

In United States v. Alhindi, No. 24-10595 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2024) (C.J. Pryor, Jordan & Marcus), the Court dismissed Mr. Alhindi’s second appeal* of his confinement under 18 U.S.C. § 4241 as moot, because the underlying criminal indictment had been dismissed during the pendency of the appeal, after the district court’s finding that Mr. [...]

2025-01-03T16:47:41+00:00January 3rd, 2025|

United States v. Gonzalez, No. 23-10578 (July 19, 2024)

In United States v. Gonzalez, No. 23-10578 (July 19, 2024) (Wilson, Luck, Lagoa), the Court affirmed Mr. Gonzalez’s conviction, in accordance with his guilty plea, for possessing stolen mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. Mr. Gonzalez, based on a 911 complainant’s report and Miami-Dade police officers’ subsequent observations, was arrested for loitering and prowling—a misdemeanor [...]

2024-08-01T20:19:37+00:00August 1st, 2024|

United States v. Steiger, No. 22-10742 (July 16, 2024)

In United States v. Steiger, No. 22-10742 (July 16, 2024) (CJ Pryor, J. Pryor, Coogler of N.D. Ala.), the Court (on remand from the en banc Court) affirmed Mr. Steiger’s twenty-year-prison sentence, which the district court imposed upon revoking Mr. Steiger’s original sentence of probation for four wire-fraud-related convictions. The revocation stemmed from Mr. Steiger's intervening state-court [...]

2024-07-31T21:34:04+00:00July 31st, 2024|

United States v. Buselli, No. 23-10272 (July 11, 2024)

In United States v. Buselli, No. 23-10272 (July 11, 2024) (Jordan, Lagoa, Hull), the Court affirmed Ms. Buselli’s convictions for murder for hire and making false statements to a federal agent, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1958(a) and 1001(a), respectively. The murder-for-hire plot was intended for Ms. Buselli’s ex-boyfriend or some other third party to murder Ms. [...]

2024-07-31T14:06:30+00:00July 31st, 2024|

United States v. Hernandez, No. 22-13311 (July 8, 2024)

In United States v. Hernandez, No. 22-13311 (July 8, 2024) (Rosenbaum, Newsom, Luck), the Court affirmed Mr. Hernandez’s sentence for several 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) convictions, among other offenses on the same indictment. Although Mr. Hernandez’s original sentence was pronounced before the First Step Act’s passage, it was judicially vacated after such passage. He therefore argued—and the government [...]

2024-07-29T20:58:15+00:00July 29th, 2024|

United States v. Wright, No. 22-12338 (Mar. 19, 2024)

In United States v. Wright, No. 22-12338 (Mar. 19, 2024) (Branch, Grant, Carnes), the Court affirmed Mr. Wright’s conviction, pursuant to a plea agreement, for producing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e). Mr. Wright argued that § 2251(a) required proof that the minor in question had volitionally participated in the sexually [...]

2024-05-01T13:17:31+00:00May 1st, 2024|
Go to Top